1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (218 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr has automatic transmission and 1965 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1965 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Lincoln Zephyr | |
| Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
| Model | 2CV | Zephyr |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 218 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 990 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 66 L |
