1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | DrifterX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 80 L |