1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S80 weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | S80 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 80 L |