1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 821 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
| Model | 2CV | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1381 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |
