1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3010 mm |