1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 891 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | C30 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 114 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |
