1965 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 2110 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom has automatic transmission and 1965 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1965 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 2CV | Phantom |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 100 L |