1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1965 Citroen Ak 350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 602 cc (2 cylinders), 1965 Citroen Ak 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Citroen Ak 350 (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ak 350 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Citroen Ak 350 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Citroen | Citroen |
| Model | Ak 350 | 2CV |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 63 L |
