1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 481 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ak 350 | Ram |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3020 mm |