1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 838 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Tribute (207 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ak 350 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 207 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1443 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 62 L |