1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Ak 350 | Epica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
