1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Ak 350 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
