1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ak 350 | Rogue |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |