1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ak 350 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 50 L |