1965 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 846 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ak 350 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ak 350 | C30 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 60 L |