1965 Citroen Ami vs. 1960 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1965 Citroen Ami is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 410 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 1960 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | Ami | Minx |
Year Released | 1965 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |