1965 Citroen Ami vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1978 Volvo 240 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 240 (104 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami.
Because 1978 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | 240 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |