1965 Citroen Ami vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1980 Volvo 240 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 240 weights approximately 820 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | 240 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |