1965 Citroen Ami vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo weights approximately 475 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Citroen | Maserati |
Model | Ami | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |