1965 Citroen Ami vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1983 Zastava 2101 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | Ami | 2101 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |