1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 588 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 132 L |
