1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Kia Sephia II
To start off, 2000 Kia Sephia II is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Kia Sephia II (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Kia Sephia II weights approximately 435 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2000 Kia Sephia II | |
| Make | Citroen | Kia |
| Model | Ami | Sephia II |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |
