1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2000 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Terrano II (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2000 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | Terrano II |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |