1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (329 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 1560 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Citroen | BMW |
Model | Ami | X5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4619 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 329 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 93 L |