1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2002 Fiat Stilo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Fiat Stilo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Fiat Stilo (101 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Fiat Stilo should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 678 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2002 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | Ami | Stilo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 58 L |