1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 516 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Ka |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 42 L |