1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Tonka (128 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Tonka weights approximately 682 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | Tonka |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 4200 mm |
