1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2003 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2003 Skoda Fabia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,390 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Skoda Fabia (74 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 510 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2003 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Citroen | Skoda |
| Model | Ami | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 45 L |
