1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2005 Dodge Dakota is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,703 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1217 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2005 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ami | Dakota |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 3703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 83 L |