1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 84 L |
