1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 399 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2008 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ami | Charger |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 72 L |