1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Nissan Qashqai
To start off, 2008 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Qashqai is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Qashqai (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Qashqai should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 862 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2008 Nissan Qashqai | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | Qashqai |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 65 L |