1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (382 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 710 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Ami | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 382 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 4190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 100 L |
