1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi TT (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 715 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2009 Audi TT | |
Make | Citroen | Audi |
Model | Ami | TT |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |