1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 932 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | 5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1552 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |