1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Buick Regal
To start off, 2011 Buick Regal is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Buick Regal (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Buick Regal weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2011 Buick Regal | |
Make | Citroen | Buick |
Model | Ami | Regal |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4831 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |