1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2011 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | Ami | Epica |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 65 L |