1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2011 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2011 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1433 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2011 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2053 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 87 L |