1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2166 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen Ami | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | Ami | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 2786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2947 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 95 L |