1965 Citroen Ami vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1965 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 993 kg more than 1965 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Citroen Ami | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Ami | S60 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2097 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1484 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2776 mm |
