1965 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Citroen DS (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1707 kg more than 1965 Citroen DS.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Citroen DS | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 2862 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 80 L |