1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1963 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 1965 DAF Daffodil is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Skoda Octavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Skoda Octavia (44 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1963 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | DAF | Skoda |
| Model | Daffodil | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 30 L |
