1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1973 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1973 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |
