1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1978 Mini MK IV
To start off, 1978 Mini MK IV is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mini MK IV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mini MK IV (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mini MK IV should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 50 kg more than 1978 Mini MK IV.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1978 Mini MK IV | |
| Make | DAF | Mini |
| Model | Daffodil | MK IV |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2040 mm |
