1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1965 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mitsubishi Minica (29 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Minica should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 95 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Minica.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1981 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Daffodil | Minica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 546 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 29 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2060 mm |
