1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1984 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1984 Plymouth Voyager is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 696 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 1984 Plymouth Voyager | |
Make | DAF | Plymouth |
Model | Daffodil | Voyager |
Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1356 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2860 mm |