1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1991 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 1991 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | DAF | Mahindra |
Model | Daffodil | Armada |
Year Released | 1965 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4310 mm |