1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1992 Skoda L
To start off, 1992 Skoda L is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Skoda L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Skoda L (57 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Skoda L should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Skoda L weights approximately 225 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1992 Skoda L | |
| Make | DAF | Skoda |
| Model | Daffodil | L |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |
