1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | Daffodil | 626 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 60 L |
