1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Daffodil | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
